-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dedup errors if input BAM file is empty #624
Labels
Comments
For clarity, what should the behaviour be? A more useful error message? |
I would say that a warning might be most obvious thing. I can see there
might be times when umi_tools is in a pipeline, when it might be useful for
it to be able to process empty files, just so as not to disrupt a pipeline
where for e.g. one of the samples had all its reads filtered out.
Ian Sudbery
(He/Him)
Senior Lecturer in Bioinformatics,
Sheffield Institute for Nucleic Acids,
School of Biosciences,
The University of Sheffield.
web: www.sudlab.co.uk
Tel: 0114 222 2738
Twitter: IanSudbery
Show Calendar Availability
<https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0?cid=aS5zdWRiZXJ5QHNoZWZmaWVsZC5hYy51aw>
…On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 10:53, Tom Smith ***@***.***> wrote:
For clarity, what *should* the behaviour be? A more useful error message?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#624 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABJELDQXFNVDF4J42E66CYTYXBBJPAVCNFSM6AAAAABCITJNECVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSOBTGI2TIMJTGE>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: