Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interpretation from CPT #105

Open
pjhaest opened this issue Sep 25, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Interpretation from CPT #105

pjhaest opened this issue Sep 25, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
dov Related to the DOV webservices question

Comments

@pjhaest
Copy link
Collaborator

pjhaest commented Sep 25, 2018

Given the new setup discerning interpretations from boreholes (AND/OR) cpt data, I just want to make sure which interpretations can originate from cpt data:

  • If I read the metadata of for example 'gecodeerde lithologie', it is not clear if ever an interpretation can come from cpt (domain)
  • the xsd states only 'boringen'
  • the DOV verkenner only gives 'informele stratigrafie' and 'formele stratigrafie' as possible selections for CPT data

Is the latter correct, only interpretations for informele and formele stratigrafie from cpt data?

@pjhaest pjhaest added the dov Related to the DOV webservices label Sep 25, 2018
@Roel Roel self-assigned this Sep 25, 2018
@Roel
Copy link
Member

Roel commented Sep 26, 2018

The latter is correct: only 'informele stratigrafie' and 'formele stratigrafie' interpretations can be either linked to CPT's/sonderingen or boreholes. All the other interpretation types are always linked to boreholes.

I agree that this currently is not clear in the metadata: since (technically) all interpretations in the WMS/WFS services come from the same table and have the same attributes, all have very similar metadata. I will clarify the metadata in this regard while adding the 'diepte_tot_m' attribute as discussed in issue #68

The XSD is confusing in the sense that it lists two types for interpretations: InterpretatieGeneriekType and InterpretatieExternType. The latter is only used for eDOV import and is not relevant for the interpretations we export. The former, InterpretatieGeneriekType is the base type where all other interpretation types extend from and has as first element a choice between either boring or sondering. Again, as with the WMS/WFS services, this is technical: in the XSD all interpretation types can be linked to either a borehole or a CPT, but in practice this will only be the case for 'informele stratigrafie' and 'formele stratigrafie', all other types will always be linked to boreholes.

@Roel
Copy link
Member

Roel commented Sep 26, 2018

I have clarified this in the attribute definitions in the feature catalogues of the interpretations. Maybe the description of the types in the featurecatalogues and/or the description in the metadata records themselves need to be clarified too though.

@Roel Roel added this to the Sprint January 2019 milestone Jan 2, 2019
@Roel Roel removed this from the Sprint January 2019 milestone Jan 28, 2019
@Roel Roel added the question label Aug 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dov Related to the DOV webservices question
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants