Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Package rename #5

Closed
dpo opened this issue Oct 4, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Package rename #5

dpo opened this issue Oct 4, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@dpo
Copy link
Member

dpo commented Oct 4, 2016

We should rename this package. The current name isn't sufficiently explicit to make it in METADATA. I thought of BenchmarkProfiles. Any other suggestions?
@JuliaSmoothOptimizers/continuousoptimizers

@abelsiqueira
Copy link
Member

I think not. PerformanceProfiles would be more familiar, but this includes data profiles too. BenchmarkProfiles might draw more attention.

@dpo
Copy link
Member Author

dpo commented Oct 4, 2016

@vepiteski Do you have other suggestions or does BenchmarkProfiles sound good?

@vepiteski
Copy link

Le 2016-10-04 à 09:36, Dominique a écrit :

@vepiteski https://github.com/vepiteski Do you have other
suggestions or does BenchmarkProfiles sound good?

I think it is OK.

PerformanceProfiles is more common, but as Abel remarked, the Pkg also
provides data profiles.

So, BenchmarkProfiles seems "optimal".

JPD


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#5 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHy_G7xEL-0Pp26k3QJsMsAnmAkyinr1ks5qwlZKgaJpZM4KNPCm.

@dpo
Copy link
Member Author

dpo commented Oct 4, 2016

Thank you. I renamed the repository. Now I'll update the contents.

@dpo
Copy link
Member Author

dpo commented Oct 4, 2016

Done in #6.

@dpo dpo closed this as completed Oct 4, 2016
@dpo dpo mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants