From 7fb25f0fd0e62425157e874a668b61bbce085fa8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julian Lettner Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:29:25 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Follow-up for lit.test.ResultCode adoption Fixup for 17f2cec5. I mixed up the labels for the ResultCode instances in my previous commit. --- litsupport/test.py | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/litsupport/test.py b/litsupport/test.py index a57f91be63..14d1be383c 100644 --- a/litsupport/test.py +++ b/litsupport/test.py @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ # However, some users rely on the lit version provided by pypi that does not require or have add_result_category. # See for more details: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20200511/780899.html try: - NOCHANGE = lit.Test.ResultCode('NOCHANGE', 'Executable Missing', False) - NOEXE = lit.Test.ResultCode('NOEXE', 'Executable Unchanged', True) + NOCHANGE = lit.Test.ResultCode('NOCHANGE', 'Executable Unchanged', False) + NOEXE = lit.Test.ResultCode('NOEXE', 'Executable Missing', True) except TypeError: NOCHANGE = lit.Test.ResultCode('NOCHANGE', False) NOEXE = lit.Test.ResultCode('NOEXE', True)