You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, in the same file you need to have the 3D value point and the values to plot in the model. I think a better way to go about this is to have:
The model (stl)
The sample names and position in 3D (csv) -- we could even perhaps merge this and the previous one
Multiple input formats where you have different information (rows vs features).
I believe this will be more convenient because the first 2 only are needed once but the 3rd kind can hold different kinds of values and could constantly change: family or species level taxonomic information, metobolomics, PCoA axes, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ahh OK, then perhaps use 3 files. The issue of having the points together with the values to display is that if you have different datasets (for example: 16S and metabolomics) you will need to add the points to both files or merge those files into 1 which could become painful for the users. Having them separate will mean that you can simply load each one independently.
Currently, in the same file you need to have the 3D value point and the values to plot in the model. I think a better way to go about this is to have:
I believe this will be more convenient because the first 2 only are needed once but the 3rd kind can hold different kinds of values and could constantly change: family or species level taxonomic information, metobolomics, PCoA axes, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: