Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Devices of the same model cannot read the second one #183

Open
zhubinsheng opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Devices of the same model cannot read the second one #183

zhubinsheng opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@zhubinsheng
Copy link

No description provided.

@zhubinsheng
Copy link
Author

zhubinsheng commented Mar 8, 2022

Screenshot from 2022-03-08 10-21-02
805ad2e0 is same;

@drauggres
Copy link
Collaborator

drauggres commented Mar 8, 2022

Can you post the output of the adb devices command?

UPD: Or better adb devices -l.

@drauggres
Copy link
Collaborator

At the moment I use serial number to distinguish between devices (e.g. same as in adb -s SERIAL shell).
Meaning that devices with identical serial number can't be accessed at the same time this way.

@zhubinsheng
Copy link
Author

In fact, can't select a device with the ADB - s command

@drauggres
Copy link
Collaborator

drauggres commented Mar 9, 2022

In this project I use https://github.com/DeviceFarmer/adbkit, it only supports serial numbers to access specific devices. With adb you can use -t TRANSPORT_ID.

I think adding support for addressing devices by transport-id in adbkit is possible, but I can't do it right now.

P.S. AFAIK serial number should be unique, so this is not a common problem.

@krishtoautomate
Copy link

i am using same models and don't see this issue on my end

@drauggres drauggres added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Mar 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants