You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the paper you have mentioned CTR-GCN to get 96.5 on NW-UCLA dataset. However when I trained and ensembled as mentioned in readme, the accuracy I got was only 95%.
Please clarify
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@SunPengP@yanghhx
Me too they mentioned in the paper CTR-GCN got 96.8% on NTU60 - Cross View. But when I trained and ensembled the four modalities, I got only 96.51% as described in the issue #36
Please if you figure out what is the reason of the difference let me know. It will be a great help.
Thanks.
In the paper you have mentioned CTR-GCN to get 96.5 on NW-UCLA dataset. However when I trained and ensembled as mentioned in readme, the accuracy I got was only 95%.
Please clarify
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: