You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To achieve decompilation of a binary closer, or possibly identical, to original source and to discover subtle bugs in re-implementation, I've automated a simple workflow of adjusting source + compiling + binary diffing. I think this could make for a useful angr-management feature.
A new option to the pseudocode view would be added that allows the user to enable re-compilation and specify compiler options. Whenever a tweak is made that prompts pseudocode regeneration, it is automatically recompiled and a diff against the original is displayed.
What my script displays:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To achieve decompilation of a binary closer, or possibly identical, to original source and to discover subtle bugs in re-implementation, I've automated a simple workflow of adjusting source + compiling + binary diffing. I think this could make for a useful angr-management feature.
A new option to the pseudocode view would be added that allows the user to enable re-compilation and specify compiler options. Whenever a tweak is made that prompts pseudocode regeneration, it is automatically recompiled and a diff against the original is displayed.
What my script displays:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: