Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Another way to get the possible return type of function for information_schema #13735

Open
goldmedal opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@goldmedal
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

As mentioned #13717 (comment), return_type could be deprecated by #13717. We should try to use return_type_from_exprs or another method for the information_schema table instead.
The challenge with using return_type_from_exprs is that the record generation of routines or parameters won't have the required expression arguments for it. 🤔

Describe the solution you'd like

No response

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Dec 13, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants