You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One more thought on this: Your help text talks about data-driven block sizes which are in the range 4 ... 13. So maybe sizes of 2 or 3 or not very interesting or meaningful anyway? Or to put it differently: What happens if you choose the recommended block size for the sample size, and then vary that size a little bit? If this still changes the results (confidence intervals) a lot, then maybe that's more problematic.
I have no idea whether this functions is actually implemented in some other language...
Don't know, but it seems that for their paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.00577.pdf) those Gao, Peng and Yan guys have implemented it somehow, for comparison. Haven't seen any code offerings, though.
Anyway, they write "It seems that the MBB method always generates a CI larger than it should be", so perhaps your latest result of having a wide band (although not so wide as before) is in line with that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: