Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review the Topic Area Data Appendix charts #273

Open
3 tasks
ExperimentsInHonesty opened this issue Nov 21, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
3 tasks

Review the Topic Area Data Appendix charts #273

ExperimentsInHonesty opened this issue Nov 21, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
milestone: missing p-feature: topic data appendix This feature requires a second label for topic role: data size: 1pt Can be done in 4-6 hours Wireframes Wireframe designs

Comments

@ExperimentsInHonesty
Copy link
Member

Overview

We need to have our DS people review the charts and make sure they make sense, so that we can finish the wireframes.

Action Items

  • Review
  • Ask Questions in comments
  • Add drawings or other helpful conversation movers

Resources/Instructions

@ExperimentsInHonesty
Copy link
Member Author

sample comment

@ejennywhiley123
Copy link

ejennywhiley123 commented Nov 21, 2023

This is my proposal for the first bar chart on the Topics/Data Appendix page. I have tried to very much keep the clean look of the previous chart, as I know this was valued.

The changes I am suggesting are to make the chart show the actual data that was collected, i.e., number of responses for each of the possible answers. And then to do the grouping / mapping of these responses into levels of need and mastery / audience as additional elements on the outside of the chart.

I have also added a box into the need line that says "no need" (we can work on wording!), so as not to mix up mastery and need and have duplicated info.

This is only a sketch but I hope that it conveys the general idea in order to gather feedback. Please let me know what you think!
@kit-katrina20 @bonniewolfe

image

@ejennywhiley123
Copy link

One additional comment in regards to the space between bars. The data being represented is discrete, so I believe that it is best practice to show the data points as separated, rather than connected.

(Definitions: discrete data is countable and has clear spaces between values, e.g., number of people in a class. Continuous data is measurable and can take any value within a range, e.g., a person's height or weight).

@ejennywhiley123
Copy link

Moving on to the next step in the story, after this headline chart, I would want to ask and answer the question "who is most likely to have a need for help". This is where we can layer in the brigade size, and investigate the hypothesis that small MSAs are more likely to need help.

You could use pie charts for this but I'm not a fan. So this is an example visualization using a stacked bar instead:

image

You can play around with the data and see how this chart would look for all of the 19 Topic areas by using this spreadsheet. Go to the tab called "Need charts" and then use the drop-down menu in cell B27 to switch between the different topic areas.

After looking a who has need (i.e. the demand side of the problem) I would then look at who can provide good assets (i.e. the supply side of the problem). The same spreadsheet has a tab called "Asset charts" which shows who can provide assets and who can provide assets that have been rated as usable. Again you can switch between topic areas using the drop-down in B27.

Here is an example of a supply-side chart for the same question:
image

Please share your feedback or ask questions if this isn't clear!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
milestone: missing p-feature: topic data appendix This feature requires a second label for topic role: data size: 1pt Can be done in 4-6 hours Wireframes Wireframe designs
Projects
Status: New Issue Review
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants