Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scale during training #50

Closed
rwn17 opened this issue Dec 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Scale during training #50

rwn17 opened this issue Dec 25, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@rwn17
Copy link

rwn17 commented Dec 25, 2024

Hi @botaoye ,

Thanks for your excellent work!

I noticed that during training, there doesn't seem to be any alignment between the Dust3r-predicted Gaussian and the GT pose. However, since Dust3r is supposed to predict scale-invariant depth, I didn't observe any alignment between them. I wondered if I missed something or if the network learned the metric scale during the training process. Thanks in advance!

Bests,
Weining

@botaoye
Copy link
Collaborator

botaoye commented Dec 25, 2024

Hi, NoPoSplat does not rely on the output of DUSt3T or MASt3R, but uses a similar canonical space prediction methodology used in DUSt3R to train the whole model, so we don't need to do an alignment between DUSt3R.

Our method cannot actually predict metric-scale Gaussians either, since the training data does not have a ground truth pose for the metric scale. However, our method can predict Gaussians that match the intrinsics of the input images, as detailed in this paper. We also employ a pose normalization to solve the scale ambiguity problem during training.

@rwn17
Copy link
Author

rwn17 commented Dec 26, 2024

Thanks for your explanation!

@rwn17 rwn17 closed this as completed Dec 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants