You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that during training, there doesn't seem to be any alignment between the Dust3r-predicted Gaussian and the GT pose. However, since Dust3r is supposed to predict scale-invariant depth, I didn't observe any alignment between them. I wondered if I missed something or if the network learned the metric scale during the training process. Thanks in advance!
Bests,
Weining
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, NoPoSplat does not rely on the output of DUSt3T or MASt3R, but uses a similar canonical space prediction methodology used in DUSt3R to train the whole model, so we don't need to do an alignment between DUSt3R.
Our method cannot actually predict metric-scale Gaussians either, since the training data does not have a ground truth pose for the metric scale. However, our method can predict Gaussians that match the intrinsics of the input images, as detailed in this paper. We also employ a pose normalization to solve the scale ambiguity problem during training.
Hi @botaoye ,
Thanks for your excellent work!
I noticed that during training, there doesn't seem to be any alignment between the Dust3r-predicted Gaussian and the GT pose. However, since Dust3r is supposed to predict scale-invariant depth, I didn't observe any alignment between them. I wondered if I missed something or if the network learned the metric scale during the training process. Thanks in advance!
Bests,
Weining
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: