Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Index correspondence problem of mutation effect prediction #3

Open
Lsxlsxls opened this issue Jul 5, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Index correspondence problem of mutation effect prediction #3

Lsxlsxls opened this issue Jul 5, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@Lsxlsxls
Copy link

Lsxlsxls commented Jul 5, 2021

Hello,I have a question in Mutation Effect Prediction.ipynb. When predicting the effects of mutation for a single mutation in PABP, for example [(126,"G","A")], like this:

pabp_data_helper.delta_elbo(pabp_vae_model,[(126,"G","A")], N_pred_iterations=500)

In the function delta_elbo, it calls the dictionary uniprot_focus_col_to_focus_idx, seems like it has wrong corresponding realtions between focus_col and focus_index. I think one to one correspondence between focus_col and focus_seq_trimmed_index is needed because the focus sequence has removed lowercase letters. Otherwise, the position of 126 G to A will mistakenly become the position of ’134‘ H to A. I don't know if I'm right. Please have a look. Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant