Skip to content

Rule #4 has the wrong code snippet #29814

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
pulkit-anand opened this issue Jun 12, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Rule #4 has the wrong code snippet #29814

pulkit-anand opened this issue Jun 12, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
dotnet-fundamentals/svc okr-quality Content-quality KR: Concerns article defects (bugs), freshness, or build warnings. waiting-on-feedback Waiting for feedback from SMEs before they can be merged

Comments

@pulkit-anand
Copy link

[Enter feedback here]
In the Rule #4, the code snippet is same as in Rule #3. This rule talks about async scenario but the code doesn't have async await for demonstration.


Document Details

Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

@tdykstra tdykstra self-assigned this Jul 12, 2022
@dotnet-bot dotnet-bot removed the ⌚ Not Triaged Not triaged label Jul 12, 2022
@tdykstra tdykstra added the waiting-on-feedback Waiting for feedback from SMEs before they can be merged label Jul 21, 2022
@gewarren gewarren assigned gewarren and unassigned tdykstra Jul 21, 2022
@ghost ghost added the okr-quality Content-quality KR: Concerns article defects (bugs), freshness, or build warnings. label Sep 7, 2022
@gewarren
Copy link
Contributor

This was fixed by #35073.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dotnet-fundamentals/svc okr-quality Content-quality KR: Concerns article defects (bugs), freshness, or build warnings. waiting-on-feedback Waiting for feedback from SMEs before they can be merged
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants