You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Our product is deployed into a wide range of external environments, each of which is responsible for managing its own Elasticsearch instance. These instances are often running older versions (e.g., Elasticsearch 8.x), and the teams managing them are outside of our control. We must maintain compatibility across all these targets, provided the feature set being used is supported by the target server.
Because the client forces the compatible-with=9 header, it fails when connecting to an Elasticsearch 8.x server—even though the actual operation is otherwise compatible. There is no way to opt out of or override this header short of reflection.
In addition, when using Elastic Cloud, the server may be upgraded automatically or by a different team without coordination. This creates a situation where the server changes out from under the client, and version rigidity in the header causes preventable runtime failures.
This tight coupling of client version to server version via HTTP headers introduces brittleness, prevents safe incremental upgrades, and creates unnecessary operational risk.
Steps to reproduce:
Use Elastic.Clients.Elasticsearch v9.x in a .NET application.
Connect to an Elasticsearch 8.x server (e.g., in Elastic Cloud or any managed environment).
Perform a standard operation (e.g., SearchAsync).
Observe the error caused by the incompatible Accept header.
Expected behavior
The client should:
Allow overriding the Accept header or compatibility version via a public configuration API.
Or, gracefully negotiate compatibility with the server when feasible.
This would enable us to upgrade the client (e.g., for bug or security fixes) without forcing downstream consumers to upgrade their Elasticsearch servers, especially in environments we don’t control.
Provide ConnectionSettings (if relevant):
varsettings=newElasticsearchClientSettings(CreatePool(),sourceSerializer:(builtin,config)=>newElasticsearchJsonNetSerializer(serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<JsonSerializerSettingsFactory>()));// Workaround using reflection (no public API available)varfield=typeof(TransportConfigurationDescriptorBase<ElasticsearchClientSettings>).GetField("_accept",BindingFlags.Instance|BindingFlags.NonPublic);field?.SetValue(settings,"application/vnd.elasticsearch+json;compatible-with=8");
Provide DebugInformation (if relevant):
Error from server:
Content-Type header [application/vnd.elasticsearch+json;compatible-with=9] is not supported
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Language clients are forward compatible; meaning that the clients support communicating with greater or equal minor versions of Elasticsearch without breaking.
The 9.x client is only compatible with 9.x and 10.x servers.
In addition, when using Elastic Cloud, the server may be upgraded automatically or by a different team without coordination. This creates a situation where the server changes out from under the client, and version rigidity in the header causes preventable runtime failures.
This tight coupling of client version to server version via HTTP headers introduces brittleness, prevents safe incremental upgrades, and creates unnecessary operational risk.
I understand that the server environment might be out of your control, but the official recommended way for upgrades is "server first" for a reason...
The whole purpose of this header is to make sure that the client and the server is actually compatible. Disabling/modifying it defeats its purpose and contrary to your statement will be an actual source of failures.
If an ES 9.x server sees the compatible-with=8 header, it will switch to a 8.x compatibility mode that actually guarantees full compatibility with the 8.x client.
An ES 8.x server obviously does not know about the capabilities of a 9.x client, changed, removed, added fields etc. which means that we can never guarantee that a 9.x client is compatible with a 8.x server.
Luckily there is a very simple solution to your problem, that allows you to be compatibly with 8.x and 9.x Elasticsearch clusters using the exact same code base:
➡ Use the latest 8.x client.
If you want to use the 9.x client and you don't care about potential runtime failures, you can override Accept and Content-Type on a per-request basis like this to disable the versioning header:
awaitclient.IndexAsync(newPerson(), x =>x.RequestConfiguration(x =>x.Accept("application/json").ContentType("application/json")));
Please note that this is completely unsupported and we won't provide any support for this use-case.
Please let me know, if that answers your question / solves your issue.
Elastic.Clients.Elasticsearch version:
9.x (e.g., 9.1.0)
Elasticsearch version:
8.x (e.g., 8.11.3) — varies across deployments
.NET runtime version:
.NET 8.0 (also applies to .NET 6.0 and 7.0)
Operating system version:
Cross-platform / environment-agnostic
Description of the problem including expected versus actual behavior:
The
Elastic.Clients.Elasticsearch
v9 client hardcodes theAccept
header to:This is not configurable via public API.
Our product is deployed into a wide range of external environments, each of which is responsible for managing its own Elasticsearch instance. These instances are often running older versions (e.g., Elasticsearch 8.x), and the teams managing them are outside of our control. We must maintain compatibility across all these targets, provided the feature set being used is supported by the target server.
Because the client forces the
compatible-with=9
header, it fails when connecting to an Elasticsearch 8.x server—even though the actual operation is otherwise compatible. There is no way to opt out of or override this header short of reflection.In addition, when using Elastic Cloud, the server may be upgraded automatically or by a different team without coordination. This creates a situation where the server changes out from under the client, and version rigidity in the header causes preventable runtime failures.
This tight coupling of client version to server version via HTTP headers introduces brittleness, prevents safe incremental upgrades, and creates unnecessary operational risk.
Steps to reproduce:
Elastic.Clients.Elasticsearch
v9.x in a .NET application.SearchAsync
).Accept
header.Expected behavior
The client should:
Accept
header or compatibility version via a public configuration API.This would enable us to upgrade the client (e.g., for bug or security fixes) without forcing downstream consumers to upgrade their Elasticsearch servers, especially in environments we don’t control.
Provide
ConnectionSettings
(if relevant):Provide
DebugInformation
(if relevant):Error from server:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: