You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the great work.
I am trying to calibrate my multi-camera fisheye(190deg) setup for an autonomous vehicle.
When I try multi-cam approach, I failed due to lack of co-obervations. Since the system is intended for 360deg surround view, there is little overlap between cameras.
Later, I tried to calibrate each camera within an individual rosbag. So, I record a rosbag for each camera. By this approach, with pinhole-equidistant model, I have the re-projection errors around 0.15-0.25 (average). Do you think the values are ok? (I consider to use ros-validator to get a better feeling.)
One final question regarding the how image size affects the calibration results. My original image res. is 1920/1280, I have to downsample images to the 640x480 for faster computation, so I do all my calibration efforts in 640x480. Would it be affecting calibration performance too?
thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello everybody,
Thanks for the great work.
I am trying to calibrate my multi-camera fisheye(190deg) setup for an autonomous vehicle.
When I try multi-cam approach, I failed due to lack of co-obervations. Since the system is intended for 360deg surround view, there is little overlap between cameras.
Later, I tried to calibrate each camera within an individual rosbag. So, I record a rosbag for each camera. By this approach, with pinhole-equidistant model, I have the re-projection errors around 0.15-0.25 (average). Do you think the values are ok? (I consider to use ros-validator to get a better feeling.)
One final question regarding the how image size affects the calibration results. My original image res. is 1920/1280, I have to downsample images to the 640x480 for faster computation, so I do all my calibration efforts in 640x480. Would it be affecting calibration performance too?
thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: