You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 12, 2022. It is now read-only.
I think Fritz and I had a conversation somewhat related to this topic, but I sort of forgot the outcome. If I have a DD where the dim is very large, and I expect the non-zero entries of the suffstats (e.g. the counts) to be very sparse, what's the right way to do this in distributions?
Essentially I want a DD where the counts[] is a Sparse<> instead of float[]. Would it be worth created a separate model which is SparseDD?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The DPD datatype degenerates to DD when shared.beta0 = 0. In this case, you'll get a dense shared.betas analogous to DD shared.alphas, and you'll get a sparse group.counts. Would that work for you?
I think Fritz and I had a conversation somewhat related to this topic, but I sort of forgot the outcome. If I have a DD where the dim is very large, and I expect the non-zero entries of the suffstats (e.g. the counts) to be very sparse, what's the right way to do this in distributions?
Essentially I want a DD where the counts[] is a Sparse<> instead of float[]. Would it be worth created a separate model which is SparseDD?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: