-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review approaches to locating objects of interest #22
Comments
If I understand the problem correctly, indeed it sounds like something that RO-Crate addresses, at least with respect to linking data models to entities. In any case I think that DRS should only (optionally) reference schemas, not "unpack" entities themselves (i.e., +1 for separation of concerns, we probably don't want to overload DRS too much). That being said, this issue is probably more fitting for DaMaSC at this point? |
Suggesting we should close this. There are two routes by which the issue can be handled:
Yes DaMaSC can potentially address the first of these. RO-Crate is a candidate in the second case. |
Suggest that TASC review of relative roles of Search and DRS bundling is needed. Current bundling use cases in the examples given below may be better addressed through the ability to identify objects of interest through queries against defined schema. Bundling as a bag of objects provides insufficient information to users.
Illustrative examples are provided in this issue
Some key questions for consideration:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: