-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request for "Guest Permission Level" #4093
Comments
I think this is already possible with org teams and unit type permissions. |
Not quite, as you can not specify write to issues but read only for other stuff |
@lafriks AFAIK a read only team is able to create issues at the moment So a read-only team with disabled Code and Pull Requests has exactly the permissions as requested. |
@6543 thanks for ping back. This PR brings a use case: A company runs a Gitea instance that requires login. Most repos are public (accessible/browsable by all co-workers). At some point, a customer or third party needs access to a specific repo and only that repo. Making such a customer account restricted and granting any needed access using team membership(s) and/or collaboration(s) is a simple way to achieve that without the need to make everything private. But in my feature request this case is needed: A company runs a Gitea instance and wants to allow public users to read wiki,add/read his issuses, download releases for a repo if rights given to him. By this we can make use customer use gitea for:
Currently, we can not limit user for not accessing source codes(and PR's) |
Description
This a feature request for defining a new permission level named as
Guest
. Rights for this level will be:Actually
Guest
permission level will be a restricted version ofRead
level without any privileges on private repository codes/files.This permission is important to make internal or external users to add/watch issues to private repositories themselves.
Please check here. As far as I see, Gitea needs
Guest
permission level. By this permission level Gitea;for PRIVATE repositories.
A small comparison:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: