You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The goal here is to determine whether it would be beneficial to include yapapi as a dependency of goth. Ideally, it would be possible to choose whether a given test should use yapapi or the lower-level, built-in yagna API client included in goth.
simpler setup for complex test scenarios (using the built-in client proves to be tedious and requires re-using helper methods, see goth tests in yagna)
ya-aioclient compatibility
Potential risks:
more complexity and support overhead in goth
tighter coupling between the projects
issues with circular dependencies, as yapapi uses goth for its integration tests
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The goal here is to determine whether it would be beneficial to include
yapapi
as a dependency ofgoth
. Ideally, it would be possible to choose whether a given test should useyapapi
or the lower-level, built-inyagna
API client included ingoth
.Potential gains:
yapapi
events (see also: [EVENTS] list places where current event interface is important yapapi#773)goth
tests inyagna
)ya-aioclient
compatibilityPotential risks:
goth
yapapi
usesgoth
for its integration testsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: