-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conduct user insights survey for preliminary research on foodseekers #1525
Comments
I have provided @naraedesigns detailed feedback on the survey via slack along with comments about recruitment. One major hurdle with a survey of this length will be recruiting participants. I am suggesting a recruitment service like Prolific through which we would be able to pre-screen our sample for low-income and other relevant demographics . I pulled a quick quote from them that is between $70 to $100 total depending on questionnaire time # of respondents. Alternatively, we could run a raffle for $50 but would need to clean our data to eliminate speeders since the allure of the prize will attract those interested only in the chance of winning. @staceyrebekahscott @itserindean @entrotech @fancyham --- Would we have some funds already available for this sort of work? Would we need to crowd-source a fund raiser? Because the goal amount is low, I expect people will be more inclined to give(?). |
As per the Design team discussion on 01/26, James suggested that we send the survey to the organizations that we have listed in our database. I suggested that we reach out to the ones who have been validated recently. Erin should be able to provide guidance on this via the work with the UCLA students. |
@staceyrebekahscott thanks for the heads up. Could you please clarify -- food resource organizations would distribute the survey to their incoming food seekers? I worry that may take too long. Whereas we could have data back overnight if we were to use Prolific. I will catch up with @naraedesigns with whom I have been slacking to find out the progression of that conversation -- I unfortunately missed the discussion at the Design meeting. |
@GigiUxR No, the idea is that these organizations would have representatives that might know how to answer these questions on behalf of food seekers. It is unlikely that we would be able to get direct contact with food seekers through this method. We do not have any funds we can allocate for using sites like Prolific. We would need to find something we could use for free. The grant money we received recently likely went to ongoing expenses for Food Oasis such as web hosting and domain purchases. |
( Some of the questions being asked in the survey will be close to impossible for anyone other than the seeker to answer. ) |
Old notesI informed Bryan, Sarah, and Jelena on 1/21 about the survey. Bryan reviewed the survey and provided helpful feedback. Gigi reviewed survey on 1/25 and provided helpful feedback. In my conversation with Gigi and Bryan, the possibility of sharing the survey on Reddit came up, and Gigi noted there are some restrictions but will look into it. |
Sharing out the survey1/26/23 - I launched the survey via the following:
1/27/23 - I shared the survey |
1/26/23 Design team meetingI shared about the survey during the 1/26/23 design team meeting and received positive feedback and helpful suggestions.
|
This is great — let’s see what kinds of responses we get from various places. Using our own networks might not be best but that’s part of what we’re learning. If we can reach out to people in the food distribution field, they can also give recommendations. I recommend taking notes on the project plan about when and where the survey was distributed, what responses we got, and a change log of survey changes (as it may evolve over time). Those will be useful when processing the results later. I’d also recommend putting our URL on the thank-you page (or even on the intro page) so that they can trust us. These surveys could also be done in-person at food distribution sites (or really, anywhere) with guerrilla-style research — the survey forms can also be printed for people to fill out by hand and hand-entered later: If doing this in person, one should:
@naraedesigns, FYI, our Slack instance doesn’t keep things older than 90 days, so if there’s anything posted in the slack channel #fola-user-insights that are relevant for the future, please copy and paste it in this issue’s Github comments (which are permanent) |
1/28 - Bryan's comments via slack Reddit might not be the perfect place to do the test due to forum restrictions but one way to approach it is to post in regional forums like LA and explain that it’s a quick anonymous study, and also to ask ‘where should I ask this’? I agree that it’s best to recruit people and pay for their time — for my previous guerrilla studies, we’d give like a $20 gift certificate to a market (cash is even better, but we used gift cards so we could expense it (and to minimize embezzlement risk (researcher walking away with money and faking results)) The funds we’ve talked about in the past is just out of our (perhaps my :) pocket — so yes, we can discuss amounts if we need to recruit from a service. Another way might be to do a Mechanical Turk — I’ve never done it before but it might be worth checking out: http://mturk.com/. Also, other sites: https://www.google.com/search?q=mturk+vs&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari. One other way is to just go to a site in person and do the survey with someone (with a honorarium/thank-you gift), or just asking people if you could ask them. That’s probably an excellent way and arguably more specific and rigorous (‘these are survey results at this location on this date’ vs anonymous self-reported — different methods, different strengths). If folks are doing it in person, gotta get consent from the service provider, too (you both probably know this, but in case, other FOLAers try it out) and will want some additional protocols so that we don’t look like INS or anything. |
A friend also suggested the following: |
@fancyham @GigiUxR just a heads up that I created a spreadsheet that includes our ideas for survey distribution as well as what's been done already. I also added this info as 2 separate links for easy viewing to the research plan, and to the main blurb of this issue. Re: change log suggestion |
1/30/23 MeetingParticipants: Gigi, Bryan, myself Gigi, Bryan, and I met tonight and discussed possible ways to collaborate - we plan to meet again along with Sarah and Jelena to continue the conversation. Action items for me
Action items for the group
|
Based on yesterday's conversation with Bryan and Gigi, I prepared a consent form in preparation for distributing the survey in person, and asked for feedback. I also asked for thoughts on requesting a quick intro/one-pager from the content team. I also created an intro deck for the research team, to explain how I created the survey, how I decided on which questions to ask, etc. I shared both documents into the slack group chat with Gigi, Bryan, Sarah, Jelena, and myself. I also shared the intro deck directly in the research channel. |
2/1 MeetingParticipants: Gigi, Bryan, Sarah, Jelena, Narae Gigi’s Notes / Action Items:
|
Updates on Survey (V1)
*Distribution strategy was not changed and active distribution efforts were paused after the 2/1 meeting, as the group decided to further edit the current survey. ======== |
I messaged the team currently working on this issue: Gigi, Bryan, Sarah, Jelena, Shirley, Jordan. I noted that the team has done a great job executing further on the survey, and that I will be transitioning off this issue in order to focus on design issues from now on. I noted that I can help answer any questions as needed and that I look forward to seeing the final deliverables/results of our work. I also updated the #fola-user-insights channel with this information. I also messaged new members Shirley and Jordan to introduce myself and noted I can help answer questions as needed. |
The new pop-up survey tool (in progress) can help us use this do this survey again (or a derivative of it) |
Overview
Food Oasis' current primary goal is to be the best free food resource locator tool for LA. Our team faces the pressing issue that we don’t know who our users are, as mentioned across team leads, so we don’t know if our product meets our users' needs and goals. Gathering some user insights, in the form of a survey, will help us better understand our users, so that we can design our application more specifically for their needs, goals, and expectations. This research will focus on our key target user: food-seekers, anyone using free food resources.
Research Plan
Resources / Documentation
To Do
Related Issues
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: