We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
code at https://github.com/howardyclo/clcc-cvpr21/blob/master/util/raw2raw.py#L92
M_AC = (1 - w[:,None,None]) * I + w[:,None,None] * M_AB M_BC = (1 - w[:,None,None]) * I + w[:,None,None] * M_BA
if Ill_c be defined by M_AC ,then M_BC should be M_BC = (1 - w[:,None,None]) * M_BA + w[:,None,None] *I
M_AC
M_BC = (1 - w[:,None,None]) * M_BA + w[:,None,None] *I
prove as below:
M_BC = M_BA @ M_AC = M_BA @ ( (1 - w[:,None,None]) * I + w[:,None,None] * M_AB ) ## ==> M_BC = ( (1 - w[:,None,None]) * M_BA + w[:,None,None] * M_BA @M_AB ) ## M_BA @M_AB closed to I theoretically. M_BC = (1 - w[:,None,None]) * M_BA + w[:,None,None] *I
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
code at https://github.com/howardyclo/clcc-cvpr21/blob/master/util/raw2raw.py#L92
if Ill_c be defined by
M_AC
,then M_BC should beM_BC = (1 - w[:,None,None]) * M_BA + w[:,None,None] *I
prove as below:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: