Name event "socket" why not "accept"?

[uasan]

Usually this event is called accept, plus the event name must be a verb

socketListener.addEventListener('accept', ...);

Maybe better?

[jasnell]

I'd like to leave the option of SocketListener becoming a mixin, potentially for the globalThis in some environments. In that case, accept might be too generic of a term, while socket is more specific to what you're listening for.