Fixed typo

Author: Verse1

README.md

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ are distinctly efficient (in terms of runtime/space complexity, expressed in Big
 
   leetcode.com's runtime benchmarking is notoriously inaccurate (re-running the same program frequently yields deltas in excess of 50%), and therefore should not be used as evidence of a solution's efficiency.
 
-  If you do want to use a proper benchmarking tool to measure improved performance over an existing solution, feel free, but there are a few things to keep in mind. In general, readability and clarity of the code (in the context of interviews) is more important than performance gains, so your if your change adds substantial complexity it may be rejected. Also, these solutions are supposed to serve as editorials for other programmers looking to improve their problem solving skills. As long as your change is aiding that mission, your change should be approved!
+  If you do want to use a proper benchmarking tool to measure improved performance over an existing solution, feel free, but there are a few things to keep in mind. In general, readability and clarity of the code (in the context of interviews) is more important than performance gains, so if your change adds substantial complexity it may be rejected. Also, these solutions are supposed to serve as editorials for other programmers looking to improve their problem solving skills. As long as your change is aiding that mission, your change should be approved!
 
 - _Can/should I add tests for my solution?_