Expand cx() functionality #100
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
I’ve been toying the idea of allowing people to swap out the “cx” function with their own one, is that something you’d be interested in? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
Hello! Just to let you know that this will be available in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey there,
I really like the features that
cva
provides but for simple cases (where I have to concatenate classes), I used to useclsx
.For the most part
cx
works fine, but I do miss theclsx({ "some-class-to-apply": someBoolean })
.Are there plans to expand on that? Or maybe even just re-export clsx?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions