a2ps-4.14-texinfo-5.x.patch

--- a2ps-4.14/doc/a2ps.texi.bero	2013-03-26 10:31:31.230137555 +0100
+++ a2ps-4.14/doc/a2ps.texi	2013-03-26 11:01:01.504006086 +0100
@@ -44,10 +44,6 @@
 @end ifnottex
 
 @c TeX variants
-@macro LaTeX
-La@TeX{}
-@end macro
-
 @macro PreTeX
 Pre@TeX{}
 @end macro
@@ -417,9 +413,9 @@ Genesis
 @c Now, that's what I call humor :)
 @cindex First Page
 This document describes GNU @pack{} version @value{VERSION}.  The latest
-versions may be found on the @href{@value{WWWHOME},@pack{} home page}.
-We plan to update the @href{http://www.gnu.org/software/a2ps/, GNU
-@pack{} home page} in the near future, in which case the latter will be
+versions may be found on the @uref{@value{WWWHOME}, home page}.
+We plan to update the @uref{@value{WWWHOME}, GNU home page}
+in the near future, in which case the latter will be
 a better source of information.
 
 We tried to make this document informative and pleasant.  It tries to be
@@ -431,8 +427,8 @@ difficult to use.  @xref{Glossary}, for
 information.
 
 Please, send us emailcards @code{:)}. Whatever the comment is, or if you
-just like @pack{}, write to @email{Miguel.Santana@@st.com, Miguel
-Santana} and @email{akim@@freefriends.org, Akim Demaille}.  But
+just like @pack{}, write to @email{Miguel.Santana@@st.com, Miguel Santana}
+and @email{akim@@freefriends.org, Akim Demaille}.  But
 @emph{never} write to either of us for asking questions, or to report
 bugs.  Chances are very high never to receive an answer, as we receive
 too many messages.  @xref{a2ps Mailing Lists}, for information on the
@@ -517,8 +513,8 @@ everybody so that mistakes get fixed as
 
 So, if you have a problem (configuration error, compilation error,
 runtime error, documentation error or unclear), first check in the FAQ
-(@pxref{FAQ}), then on the page @href{@value{WWWHOME}/bugs.html,Known
-@pack{} Bugs} if the issue has not been addressed yet.  If it is not the
+(@pxref{FAQ}), then on the page @uref{@value{WWWHOME}/bugs.html,Known Bugs}
+if the issue has not been addressed yet.  If it is not the
 case, but it appears that the version of @pack{} you have is old,
 consider upgrading.
 
@@ -2802,8 +2798,7 @@ Thou shalt start your PostScript DSC con
 
 The bad news is that some printers will reject this header.  Then you
 may change this header without any worry since the PostScript produced
-by @pack{} is also 100% PostScript level 1@footnote{That is to say, there
-are no PostScript printers that don't understand these files.}.
+by @pack{} is also 100% PostScript level 1@footnote{That is to say, there are no PostScript printers that don't understand these files.}.
 
 @defvr {Configuration Setting} OutputFirstLine: @var{magic-number}
 @cindex @samp{OutputFirstLine:}
@@ -3971,13 +3966,13 @@ Quote @var{text} so that no special sequ
 @itemx \end@{enumerate@}
 @itemx \begin@{description@}
 @itemx \end@{description@}
-These commands are legal in @LaTeX but have no sense in @PreTeX{}.
+These commands are legal in @LaTeX{} but have no sense in @PreTeX{}.
 Hence there are simply ignored and not printed (if immediately followed
 by an end-of-line).
 @end table
 
 @node Differences with LaTeX
-@subsubsection Differences with @LaTeX
+@subsubsection Differences with @LaTeX{}
 The following symbols, inherited from the style sheet @code{Symbol}, are
 not supported by @LaTeX{}:
 
@@ -4124,9 +4119,9 @@ beautiful, with any character you might
 prefix part of the file name, and is alpha-numerical, lower case, and
 less than 8 characters long.
 
-Anywhere @pack{} needs to recognize a style sheet by a name, @strong{it
-uses the key} (in the @file{sheets.map} file, with the option @samp{-E},
-etc.).
+Anywhere @pack{} needs to recognize a style sheet by a name,
+@strong{it uses the key} (in the @file{sheets.map} file, with the
+option @samp{-E}, etc.).
 
 As an example, C++ is implemented in a file called @file{cxx.ssh}, in
 which the name is declared to be @samp{C++}.
@@ -5672,7 +5667,7 @@ supporting a @samp{--help}-like option.
 @subsection Invoking @code{card}
 
 @example
-card [@var{options}] @var{applications} [-- @var{@pack{}-options}]
+card [@var{options}] @var{applications} [-- @var{-options}]
 @end example
 
 @noindent
@@ -5680,7 +5675,7 @@ card [@var{options}] @var{applications}
 @var{applications}' help message (typically by the options @samp{--help}
 or @samp{-h}), and pretty prints it thanks to @pack{} (or the content of
 the environment variable @samp{A2PS} if it is set).
-@var{@pack{}-options} are passed to @pack{}.
+@var{-options} are passed to @pack{}.
 
 Supported options are:
 
@@ -5874,12 +5869,12 @@ difference finder,wdiff,GNU wdiff}) to e
 @subsection Invoking @code{pdiff}
 
 @example
-pdiff [@var{options}] @var{file-1} @var{file-2} [-- @var{@pack{}-options}]
+pdiff [@var{options}] @var{file-1} @var{file-2} [-- @var{-options}]
 @end example
 
 @noindent
 make a pretty comparison between @var{file-1} and @var{file-2}.
-@var{@pack{}-options} are passed to @pack{}.
+@var{-options} are passed to @pack{}.
 
 Supported options are:
 
@@ -6222,7 +6217,7 @@ Error related questions.
 @subsection Why Does it Print Nothing?
 
 @quotation
-@i{@pack{} works OK, but the printer prints nothing.}
+@i{works OK, but the printer prints nothing.}
 @end quotation
 
 There are two ways that printing can fail: silently, or with a
@@ -6351,7 +6346,7 @@ If it is incorrect, ask for help around
 @subsection Why Does it Say my File is Binary?
 
 @quotation
-@i{@pack{} complains that my file is binary though it is not.}
+@i{complains that my file is binary though it is not.}
 @end quotation
 
 There are several reasons that can cause @pack{} to consider a file is
@@ -6591,7 +6586,7 @@ format you want for the date: @xref{Esca
 @subsection Why Have the Options Changed?
 
 @quotation
-@i{The options of this @pack{} are not the same as in the previous versions.}
+@i{The options of this are not the same as in the previous versions.}
 @end quotation
 
 True.  But the old scheme (up to version 4.6.1) prevented us from