You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here, we should not be able to commute each l through m without picking up some unknown commutators. However, this outputs l_{a} m_{b} l_{c}, suggesting that the algorithm assumes that, since l commutes with itself, this expression is symmetric in a,c. This sadly isn't sufficient, so we get the wrong answer.
Note that if alternatively l does not commute with itself, this issue is dodged:
If I understand correctly, consider this (v2.2.0):
Here, we should not be able to commute each
l
throughm
without picking up some unknown commutators. However, this outputsl_{a} m_{b} l_{c}
, suggesting that the algorithm assumes that, sincel
commutes with itself, this expression is symmetric ina,c
. This sadly isn't sufficient, so we get the wrong answer.Note that if alternatively
l
does not commute with itself, this issue is dodged:(Prints
l_{c} m_{b} l_{a}
.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: