Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changes to support 220 volts #10

Open
brghena opened this issue Sep 15, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Changes to support 220 volts #10

brghena opened this issue Sep 15, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@brghena
Copy link
Member

brghena commented Sep 15, 2017

According to Sam DeBruin:

One of my recent goals has been to determine why PowerBlade doesn’t work on 220v, even though it definitely should. I recently ran a test on the 220v source, and although PowerBlade boots and sends packets, the values for voltage and power are wrong. I determined that the voltage AC wave is actually saturating the amplifiers at 220v, which leads to the error.

I also found the cause. If you do the amplifier math (I use KCL) the voltage measurement circuit is actually wrong. The GND symbol at (-2.3 -1.6) on page 5 should actually be VCC. I can take a picture of my math if you want, but its pretty simple to do the calculation yourself. The GND symbol adds a +Vcc/2 term to the output equation, which leads to saturation at high voltages.

The message: in future revisions change that GND to VCC. i.e. RI2 goes from the common terminal to VCC rather than GND. I would also recommend turning down the gain slightly, although that is less important.

We should fix this before producing any additional PowerBlades.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant