Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why not expose VM host routes? #4

Open
denizaydin opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

why not expose VM host routes? #4

denizaydin opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@denizaydin
Copy link

Hi,
What is the reason for using gateway chassis for self-service network routing? If the SNAT is not enabled for the Routers, the host routes of the VM can be advertised to the underlay.

And also, for the BGP agent, instead of using kernel space for BGP next-hop, the solution BGP floating IPs over l2 segmented network seems a promising feature. It allows a BGP next-hop address space that can be used for advertising the routes. While creating the router, using this feature, a unique ip address can be assigned to every DVR where FRR will use this ip address as a BGP next-hop. This unique address can also be used for distributed SNAT.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant