Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparing to outdated JSON spec (v5.0) #192

Open
janbrasna opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #194
Open

Comparing to outdated JSON spec (v5.0) #192

janbrasna opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #194

Comments

@janbrasna
Copy link

Some time ago the location of uptodate JSON specs moved from S3 security.mozilla.org (where the last published is v5.0 from 6/19) to ghio ssl-config.mozilla.org (where the current guidelines spec v5.7 from 5/23 is located).

So the URL has to change to keep tracking the newer config updates:

sstlsurl = "https://statics.tls.security.mozilla.org/server-side-tls-conf.json"

(+ the local snapshot for offline/failover also needs to be updated beyond v5.0…)

and also checked to see how the JSON structure changed over time (it doesn't follow semver meaning breaking changes in the actual json data/schema happens even between minor versions).

@janbrasna
Copy link
Author

So basically the only change to support the current format would be from foo.openssl_ciphers to foo.ciphers.openssl, otherwise updating from v5.0 to v5.7 guidelines should be pretty straightforward.

It may need some tweaks in analyze.py logic regarding enforcing ordering etc., that has probably changed over time, too…

Besides that, the only quirk would be:

mozilla.org:443 has obscure or unknown ssl/tls
Changes needed to match the old level:
* enable TLSv1.3

o_O

@janbrasna janbrasna linked a pull request Nov 18, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant