-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
score-voting #765
Comments
What about ordering your score from high to low or vice versa? |
@dartcafe that would be cool and convenient! (but don't confuse ordinal voting methods with score-voting ones , see the theory and arguments on http://scorevoting.net/ ) |
I also need this feature for organizing Gentoo GSoC |
I'm also looking for a poll in a score method. a 5-star ranking method would be enough in my case. Would be pretty amazing if you people could enhance NC polls with more methods! |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
@dartcafe that's not what I mean. I need a poll where each participant gets a fixed number of votes that he can freely distribute over all options, also more than 1 per option. E.g. 3 Points available, all 3 can be assigned to Option 1, or 2 to Option 1 , 1 for Option B, you get the idea. Currently, only yes, maybe, no can be used, not a number of points. But after further reading, this is usually referred to as dot voting and might yet be another voting model that @MellowVoidUser requested... |
Yes seems to be another type of voting. This would need a separate issue |
An inspiration for the implementation of this new poll type from Loomio: https://help.loomio.com/en/user_manual/polls/proposal_types/index.html#score-poll |
I would love to have a score-voting poll for many nuanced single-winner (small-)group-decisions.
see http://scorevoting.net/
It can be argued this already exists, but currently it's limited to yes, no or maybe while I would like 0-10 or even 0-99 as possible scores.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: