Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] LocalDocs-like wikimedia access #2789

Closed
goteusz-maszyk opened this issue Aug 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

[Feature] LocalDocs-like wikimedia access #2789

goteusz-maszyk opened this issue Aug 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@goteusz-maszyk
Copy link

Feature Request

Because the LLM does not have direct access to the internet, it could be able to return a "special response" forcing the app to download information for specified "thing". For example:

User: What's Radom?
Assistant: {fetch_wikimedia:Radom}
The app fetches Wikidata, Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Nominatim(?), etc. to provide information and saves it in local docs. User is informed about it and is requested to wait a while.
System: {fetch_ready}
Assistant now has access in cached local docs (special folder) to latest information
Assistant: Radom is a city in central Poland, located in the Masovian Voivodeship, around 100 km south of Warsaw. (continues)

Right now, the assistant sometimes fails to provide valid information or thinks that some towns that are 50km from each other are close. The fetched answer should be cached and if data lake is on, the assistant's response should be sent for training model if it was "liked".

@goteusz-maszyk goteusz-maszyk added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 3, 2024
@cebtenzzre
Copy link
Member

Tool calling is already being worked on (#2737). Let's continue to track this as #1344 and focus on more specific needs once it is implemented.

@cebtenzzre cebtenzzre closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants