-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UPF dpdk-mode with virtio-net don't process downlink traffic #692
Comments
This issue has been stale for 30 days and will be closed in 5 days. Comment to keep it open. |
This issue has been stale for 30 days and will be closed in 5 days. Comment to keep it open. |
This issue has been stale for 30 days and will be closed in 5 days. Comment to keep it open. |
you might have inserted rules for uplink but not for downlink. pls check. |
Could you please clarify how to check content of PDR lookup table? |
This issue has been stale for 30 days and will be closed in 5 days. Comment to keep it open. |
This issue has been stale for 30 days and will be closed in 5 days. Comment to keep it open. |
This issue has been stale for 30 days and will be closed in 5 days. Comment to keep it open. |
This issue has been stale for 30 days and will be closed in 5 days. Comment to keep it open. |
This issue has been stale for 30 days and will be closed in 5 days. Comment to keep it open. |
This issue has been stale for 30 days and will be closed in 5 days. Comment to keep it open. |
Hi, I'm trying to run UPF inside KVM machine via DPDK mode, where network interfaces are emulated by KVM and are connected to Linux bridge on the host machine.
UPF stars normally, DPDK seems to be working:
Uplink works fine, it is decasulated from GTP-U on access interface, goes to Core interface, but answers on Core interface are dropped by PDRLookup module:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4998895/235608817-98c44bc4-78cf-4cf1-8944-aae9f4bbe286.png)
When session is established on UPF I see following errors in Bess-pfcpiface log
And in Bess-container's log:
As far as I could get through the code it seems to me that some kind of initialization of hash table for rules fails on virtio-net device. But it is not clear for me should it work in theory or not?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: