You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not sure about the "multiple MCs" section of the Sonata form - exposition types page. What it seems to be describing is the trimodular block, but the way it is described ("Sometimes the composer reaches an MC, the S degenerates, and another MC is reached") could also describe an MC-declined.
On Sonata form - exposition types page, I propose that we get rid of the "multiple MC" label and stick with trimodular block. Within that subsection, we need to emphasize the importance of the patterns associated with trimodular block so that the MC-declined page doesn't cause confusion.
I'm not sure about the "multiple MCs" section of the Sonata form - exposition types page. What it seems to be describing is the trimodular block, but the way it is described ("Sometimes the composer reaches an MC, the S degenerates, and another MC is reached") could also describe an MC-declined.
We reference the MC-declined on Sonata form - structural points of arrival and the description there is the same as of the trimodular block.
On Sonata form - exposition types page, I propose that we get rid of the "multiple MC" label and stick with trimodular block. Within that subsection, we need to emphasize the importance of the patterns associated with trimodular block so that the MC-declined page doesn't cause confusion.
Comments?
//cc @kshaffer @brynhughes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: