Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IE 11 - unequal width of the columns initially #55

Closed
solankirohan opened this issue May 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

IE 11 - unequal width of the columns initially #55

solankirohan opened this issue May 13, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@solankirohan
Copy link

solankirohan commented May 13, 2020

Hello - I am observing that on IE 11 when the masonry layout renders, it initially renders with unequal column widths, then if I perform any interactions in the page like clicks, the columns are I guess re-renders and they are displayed with correct width (equal width column). In Chrome, this works without any issues.
Has anyone observed this issue?
I have a release planned on Monday, hence looking for some urgent help, at least if there are any workarounds. thank you in advance.

@paulcollett
Copy link
Owner

paulcollett commented May 13, 2020

Things you can try:

  1. make sure your flex values have been automatically or manually "vendor prefixed" with ie11 support
  2. ie11 specific hacks for additional css rules (play with setting a specific width on child items etc, or even override the columns layouts using floats - but that should be last resort)

It's also worth noting that IE11 also has very low market share these days. So the extra effort may not be worth it in a lot of cases, but I can't speak for yours specifically

@solankirohan
Copy link
Author

Thanks a lot, @paulcollett for responding so fast. Unfortunately, this is an enterprise app, hence I need to support IE as well :( . I'll take a look at your suggestions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants