Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 32 bit testing to continous integration #14

Closed
pauldreik opened this issue Nov 11, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Add 32 bit testing to continous integration #14

pauldreik opened this issue Nov 11, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed quality related to code quality (correctness, easy to follow)

Comments

@pauldreik
Copy link
Owner

pauldreik commented Nov 11, 2018

Rdfind 1.4.0 failed to build on some of the Debian's build machines. It worked on amd64, arm64, mips64, ppc64el, s390x, alpha, ia64, ppc64, riscv64 and sparc64. It failed on armel, armhf, i386,mips,hppa, hurd-i386,m68k, powerpc, powerpcspe, sh4 and x32. The common denominator is that all those are (I believe) 32 bit platforms.
This demonstrates that building on a single architecture (amd64) is not enough.
Here are some ideas how to fix this on appveyour and/or travis

  • build on 32 bit x86 (how? through debian multiarch?)
  • qemu ?
  • docker?
  • x32?

Is there any freely available continuous integration that uses arm? Thankful for input and suggestions.

@pauldreik pauldreik added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed quality related to code quality (correctness, easy to follow) labels Nov 11, 2018
@pauldreik
Copy link
Owner Author

I solved this with gcc multilib for compiling with -m32 on amd64.
It is now implemented on master, runs on appveyor.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed quality related to code quality (correctness, easy to follow)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant