You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is this a new feature, an improvement, or a change to existing functionality?
New Feature
How would you describe the priority of this feature request
Critical (currently preventing usage)
Please provide a clear description of problem this feature solves
The (most used) Leiden implementation in leidenalg supports multiplex clustering, where you can cluster multiple graphs with the same vertices jointly. In the field of single-cell transcriptomics and spatially resolved transcriptomics this can be used to cluster multi-modality data (as done in muon) or to jointly cluster cells based on their features and spatial neighborhoods (as done in SpatialLeiden).
With the increasing datasets (hundred thousands to millions of cells/vertices), runtime for Leiden clustering on the CPU becomes a limiting factor for exploring various parameter combinations.
Describe your ideal solution
The leiden function should support a list (or similar) of graphs as input. Therefore, also the resolution parameter would need to be extended to support a resolution for each graph (layer). Furthermore, a new parameter that gives a weight to each layer corresponding to its "importance" would be needed.
Describe any alternatives you have considered
No response
Additional context
No response
Code of Conduct
I agree to follow cuGraph's Code of Conduct
I have searched the open feature requests and have found no duplicates for this feature request
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would also consider adding support for directed weighted graphs since scanpy.tl.leiden uses a directed weighted graph with leidenalg package.(Nevermind since they are moving to igraph). Also, support for fixing the membership labels for a part of the graph is useful when dealing with merging of two different datasets: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-71805-1.
Is this a new feature, an improvement, or a change to existing functionality?
New Feature
How would you describe the priority of this feature request
Critical (currently preventing usage)
Please provide a clear description of problem this feature solves
The (most used) Leiden implementation in leidenalg supports multiplex clustering, where you can cluster multiple graphs with the same vertices jointly. In the field of single-cell transcriptomics and spatially resolved transcriptomics this can be used to cluster multi-modality data (as done in muon) or to jointly cluster cells based on their features and spatial neighborhoods (as done in SpatialLeiden).
With the increasing datasets (hundred thousands to millions of cells/vertices), runtime for Leiden clustering on the CPU becomes a limiting factor for exploring various parameter combinations.
Describe your ideal solution
The leiden function should support a list (or similar) of graphs as input. Therefore, also the resolution parameter would need to be extended to support a resolution for each graph (layer). Furthermore, a new parameter that gives a weight to each layer corresponding to its "importance" would be needed.
Describe any alternatives you have considered
No response
Additional context
No response
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: