Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance on ImageNet data (and similarly sized images) #16

Closed
seansaito opened this issue Oct 13, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Performance on ImageNet data (and similarly sized images) #16

seansaito opened this issue Oct 13, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@seansaito
Copy link

I notice that the model by default assumes images of dimensions 64x64. I'm curious how the model/distance metric performs for higher resolutions like that of ImageNet (224x224).

@richzhang
Copy link
Owner

The model is fully-convolutional, so it can be run at any resolution. All our empirical tests are on 64x64 though.

@seansaito
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the reply! I see, any intuitions on how well it would work on 224x224 data?

@richzhang
Copy link
Owner

The edge effects will be slightly different, but it should work okay.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants