Add NAPOT type for parameters

[james-ball-qualcomm]

Based on email conversation with @allenjbaum and @dhower-qc

See https://lists.riscv.org/g/csc-tests-models-recommend/topic/109446970#msg128

[dhower-qc]

This isn't a small change; JSON Schema can't represent a power-of-2.

[allenjbaum]

It can be a smal integer interpeted as a power of 2? Or an enum?

…

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:13 PM Derek Hower ***@***.***> wrote: This isn't a small change; JSON Schema can't represent a power-of-2. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#305 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHPXVJUWEXYGX53UMJMKCY32B6F7TAVCNFSM6AAAAABSJ2Q64KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIOJUG4YTSNJXHE> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[dhower-qc]

that we can do.

[james-ball-qualcomm]

I'm not quite sure why this got closed. Can you explain why?

[allenjbaum]

I saw that go by also. NAPOT is a power-of-two, and can be defined as an enum (1, 2, 4, 8, or 0x1, 0x10, 0x100, etc) or it can be defined as an Uint in the range 0..63 which is interpreted to be the power of two.. I interpreted closing this to mean there are already small range Uints defined, so you don't need to do anything

…

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 6:27 AM james-ball-qualcomm < ***@***.***> wrote: I'm not quite sure why this got closed. Can you explain why? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#305 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHPXVJSC5NHPRFOQYJYF7CD2GQSNRAVCNFSM6AAAAABSJ2Q64KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKNJXGEYTQMZYGE> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>