How to make a proof available for Tuple if it exists for EmptyTuple and *:? #15690
s5bug
started this conversation in
General Discussion
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Take this method of proving that
Map[T, F ∘ G]
is equivalent toMap[Map[T, G], F]
:It doesn't make a proof available for
X <: Tuple
, that isfails.
While it is possible that one might call
proof[F, G, Tuple]
(or some other case that's irreducible), is there a way to prove that they're irreducible in the same way, and get a general proof out?cc @Adam-Vandervorst
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions