Merge pull request coffeescript-cookbook#117 from csikosjanos/master

michaelglass · michaelglass · commit 0a4064608651 · 2014-08-22T18:14:19.000-07:00
Update outdated external link to an article
diff --git a/chapters/metaprogramming/extending-built-in-objects.md b/chapters/metaprogramming/extending-built-in-objects.md
@@ -23,4 +23,4 @@ String::capitalize = () ->
 
 Objects in JavaScript (and thus, in CoffeeScript) have a prototype member that defines what member functions should be available on all objects based on that prototype. In CoffeeScript, you can access the prototype directly via the `::` operator.
 
-**Note:** Although it's quite common in languages like Ruby, extending native objects is often considered bad practice in JavaScript (see: [Maintainable JavaScript: Don’t modify objects you don’t own](http://www.nczonline.net/blog/2010/03/02/maintainable-javascript-dont-modify-objects-you-down-own/); [Extending built-in native objects. Evil or not?](http://perfectionkills.com/extending-built-in-native-objects-evil-or-not/)).
+**Note:** Although it's quite common in languages like Ruby, extending native objects is often considered bad practice in JavaScript (see: [Maintainable JavaScript: Don’t modify objects you don’t own](http://www.nczonline.net/blog/2010/03/02/maintainable-javascript-dont-modify-objects-you-down-own/); [Extending built-in native objects. Evil or not?](http://perfectionkills.com/extending-native-builtins/)).

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -23,4 +23,4 @@ String::capitalize = () ->`
`23`	`23`
`24`	`24`	Objects in JavaScript (and thus, in CoffeeScript) have a prototype member that defines what member functions should be available on all objects based on that prototype. In CoffeeScript, you can access the prototype directly via the `::` operator.
`25`	`25`
`26`		`-Note: Although it's quite common in languages like Ruby, extending native objects is often considered bad practice in JavaScript (see: [Maintainable JavaScript: Don’t modify objects you don’t own](http://www.nczonline.net/blog/2010/03/02/maintainable-javascript-dont-modify-objects-you-down-own/); [Extending built-in native objects. Evil or not?](http://perfectionkills.com/extending-built-in-native-objects-evil-or-not/)).`
	`26`	`+Note: Although it's quite common in languages like Ruby, extending native objects is often considered bad practice in JavaScript (see: [Maintainable JavaScript: Don’t modify objects you don’t own](http://www.nczonline.net/blog/2010/03/02/maintainable-javascript-dont-modify-objects-you-down-own/); [Extending built-in native objects. Evil or not?](http://perfectionkills.com/extending-native-builtins/)).`