Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

--from not respected post abnormal restart #56

Closed
jun0tpyrc opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

--from not respected post abnormal restart #56

jun0tpyrc opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@jun0tpyrc
Copy link

jun0tpyrc commented Jun 25, 2024

let's say specifying 38200000 and indexed some blocks

[ 4][t 6][2024-06-25 01:37:11.480331842][EventProcessor.cpp:138][!jetton_wallet_detector]       Event: O9Va5oASa8M1vxVbQOombqnJsPfbUrrN83KIQpzBOkI=
[ 4][t 6][2024-06-25 01:37:11.480345057][EventProcessor.cpp:138][!jetton_wallet_detector]       Event: naoZXe3ImW5vNWwRCzZLwvs3H+//7JPHQeIHz56Uun0=
[ 4][t 6][2024-06-25 01:37:11.480361491][EventProcessor.cpp:138][!jetton_wallet_detector]       Event: yEDcvyphTsVy7ptEKQTHZm62+qKzlnGai0J0uHKqYYM=
[ 4][t 6][2024-06-25 01:37:11.480373049][EventProcessor.cpp:138][!jetton_wallet_detector]       Event: TBfPHcrF1sZTfUwbYiMl7XOYAKGh9PFAmQmEsnDOpd8=
[ 4][t 6][2024-06-25 01:37:11.480381686][EventProcessor.cpp:138][!jetton_wallet_detector]       Event: NqjwnMflMbsBJ1Y4NR94C3mZ1j3+lKAyPJLlHIVRxks=
[pid 11] [time 1719279431] Signal: 11
------- Stack Backtrace -------
ton-index-postgres(+0x35b042)[0x5a7e11d38042]
ton-index-postgres(+0x35b355)[0x5a7e11d38355]
ton-index-postgres(+0x35ae9f)[0x5a7e11d37e9f]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x42520)[0x77effc08f520]
ton-index-postgres(+0x363d58)[0x5a7e11d40d58]
ton-index-postgres(+0x364045)[0x5a7e11d41045]
ton-index-postgres(+0x328fa5)[0x5a7e11d05fa5]
ton-index-postgres(+0x331d29)[0x5a7e11d0ed29]
ton-index-postgres(+0x3348a6)[0x5a7e11d118a6]
ton-index-postgres(+0x33741b)[0x5a7e11d1441b]
ton-index-postgres(+0x339c55)[0x5a7e11d16c55]
ton-index-postgres(+0x398ab6)[0x5a7e11d75ab6]
ton-index-postgres(+0x398cfd)[0x5a7e11d75cfd]
ton-index-postgres(+0x3a98c3)[0x5a7e11d868c3]
ton-index-postgres(+0x39c6bf)[0x5a7e11d796bf]
ton-index-postgres(+0x2a1b8a)[0x5a7e11c7eb8a]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x94ac3)[0x77effc0e1ac3]

after hitting this abnormal restart, it will not respect the last ones and go from very low seqno (which may not exist for non-archive node nor wanted )

@jun0tpyrc
Copy link
Author

this occur occasionally , but if reboot index-worker one or few times ,it works again

@dungeon-master-666
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for reporting! We've made some improvements, and this bug should be fixed in the latest commit of the master branch. Feel free to reopen the issue if you still encounter it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants