You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After recent update of Gnome, I've noticed that my favorite theme ( 😄 ) has troubles with top panel buttons (as on attached screenshot below).
I was able to find out that that the reason of this issue sits in gnome-shell.css file, basically commenting out the following lines resolved the issue (I've hidden all the unnecessary lines for this case):
In my case the Panel buttons are looking just fine (look at the screenshots below, after above fix), both for the centered calendar button, as for the other ones. Should I prepare a Pull Request for this update (but with lines removed instead of commented out)? I can do so, yet I wasn't really sure if there aren't any ongoing works in progress :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jakubzet
changed the title
Incorrect styling in Panel Button in Gnome 47
Incorrect styling in Panel Button in Gnome 47 (with suggested fix)
Dec 3, 2024
The error disappeared after latest update of Gnome (47.1.1-165-1-x86_64 to 47.2-166-1-x86_64). Seems that was some bug in the Gnome itself, therefore I'm closing this issue :)
After recent update of Gnome, I've noticed that my favorite theme ( 😄 ) has troubles with top panel buttons (as on attached screenshot below).
I was able to find out that that the reason of this issue sits in
gnome-shell.css
file, basically commenting out the following lines resolved the issue (I've hidden all the unnecessary lines for this case):In my case the Panel buttons are looking just fine (look at the screenshots below, after above fix), both for the centered calendar button, as for the other ones. Should I prepare a Pull Request for this update (but with lines removed instead of commented out)? I can do so, yet I wasn't really sure if there aren't any ongoing works in progress :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: