You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I also noticed this, and wonder why? Wouldn't complex metagenomes benefit from a higher --min-count setting? Or is this not as straightforward, because complex metagenomes might contain both organisms that are present at very high coverage and at low coverage?
The preset meta-large uses the option
--min-count 1
, in contrast to the default--min-count 2
:megahit/src/megahit
Line 500 in 36f5d45
This is not mentioned in the help message:
megahit/src/megahit
Line 81 in 36f5d45
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: