Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Runtime slower than expected? #301

Open
martin-hartmann opened this issue Mar 18, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Runtime slower than expected? #301

martin-hartmann opened this issue Mar 18, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@martin-hartmann
Copy link

I run megahit on a soil metagenome dataset, but only on 1 out of the 60 samples to test speed The dataset contains PE reads of each 4.7Gbp (32M reads each) and one single read file (PEs that were able to be merged) of 13.7 Gbp (60M reads). I am running this on a server with 1TB of RAM and 96 CPUs. Around 4% of the memory and most CPUs are used when monitored via "top". It is running with --presets meta-large as recommended for soil metagenomes.

It runs now for 48 hours and is far away from being done. This seems to me too long given the benchmarks mentioned in the paper. What run times do I need to expect given the available computer power and the size and nature of the sequence files? Can I somehow boost performance? Any help here is greatly appreciated.

Kind regards,
Martin

@ChillarAnand
Copy link

Were you able to boost the performance?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants