Issues in "Note on Persistence" in DID Syntax section

[shigeya]

Regarding the 3.1 DID Syntax Section, there is a note on persistence.
I observe two issues.

• Terminology UUID is mentioned only once in the entire document. Do we need to have the UUID terminology entry just for this description?
• I think this note does not belong to the "DID Syntax" section

I propose eliminating UUID terminology entry and adding a reference to UUID since mentioning UUID itself seems useful.

Where to relocate is a question. I'm currently re-reviewing whole "Notes" and related paragraphs; I observe there are some paragraphs we want to transform into Notes, and the others require relocation. I'll post another issue to discuss how notes need to be reorganized after the review.

[kdenhartog]

Related to this work is currently being revised as well by @talltree in #457

I think we can incorporate this feedback into that PR and close once #457 is merged.

[shigeya]

@kdenhartog I see. I will check #457

[shigeya]

@kdenhartog Read thorough #457. Looks like it already became beyond just a note and it needs relocation. I will comment in #457.

[msporny]

This issue will be closed once PR #457 is merged.

[talltree]

Per @shigeya's suggestion, as well as the feedback in the last DID WG special topic call, I revised #457 to move it to the Security Considerations section.

[shigeya]

As PR #457 and follow-up PR #574 discussing persistence and close-to-be-approved PR #574 relocate the text to the security section, this issue can be closed once PR #574 merges.

[msporny]

PR #574 has been merged, closing.