Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Covering a block doesn't make it dirty #769

Open
Irup opened this issue Sep 2, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Covering a block doesn't make it dirty #769

Irup opened this issue Sep 2, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
AoSβ compatibility enhancement request/proposal to add a new feature

Comments

@Irup
Copy link

Irup commented Sep 2, 2018

In the original client, if you obscure all 6 sides of a block with other blocks, the obscured block will become a generic filler dirt block.
This doesn't happen in OpenSpades; it keeps track of all surface blocks, and preserves their color even when they're completely obscured.
@NotAFile
Copy link
Contributor

NotAFile commented Sep 2, 2018

I think this is a dupe... Either way I prefer it this way.

@Irup
Copy link
Author

Irup commented Sep 2, 2018

I prefer the Voxlap way. This could easily just be a menu setting.

@NotAFile
Copy link
Contributor

NotAFile commented Sep 2, 2018

I don't think this is a thing that really belongs in a setting.

@Irup
Copy link
Author

Irup commented Sep 2, 2018

I do.

@siecvi
Copy link

siecvi commented Sep 3, 2018

Voxlap way please

@feikname feikname added AoSβ compatibility enhancement request/proposal to add a new feature labels Sep 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
AoSβ compatibility enhancement request/proposal to add a new feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@feikname @NotAFile @siecvi @Irup