Skip to content

Disable scheduled workflow to be run in fork repos #2060

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2025

Conversation

antonwolfy
Copy link
Collaborator

@antonwolfy antonwolfy commented Apr 24, 2025

This PR proposes to enable nightly tests run to be scheduled only for main repo, excluding fork ones.

  • Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
  • Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to an issue with a reproducer?
  • Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
  • Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
  • Have you checked performance impact of proposed changes?
  • Have you added documentation for your changes, if necessary?
  • Have you added your changes to the changelog?
  • If this PR is a work in progress, are you opening the PR as a draft?

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 24, 2025

Deleted rendered PR docs from intelpython.github.com/dpctl, latest should be updated shortly. 🤞

Copy link

Array API standard conformance tests for dpctl=0.20.0dev0=py310h93fe807_160 ran successfully.
Passed: 1108
Failed: 4
Skipped: 119

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Coverage Status

coverage: 86.419%. remained the same
when pulling c487b92 on disable-nightly-workflow-in-forks
into 8dcc44f on master.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ndgrigorian ndgrigorian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@ndgrigorian ndgrigorian merged commit d47f57d into master Apr 25, 2025
75 checks passed
@ndgrigorian ndgrigorian deleted the disable-nightly-workflow-in-forks branch April 25, 2025 05:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants