-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: improve building IWD and IPak obj containers #286
Draft
Laupetin
wants to merge
17
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
feature/obj-container-improvements
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Laupetin
force-pushed
the
feature/obj-container-improvements
branch
5 times, most recently
from
October 19, 2024 20:37
34f54a8
to
252d3b8
Compare
Laupetin
force-pushed
the
feature/obj-container-improvements
branch
from
October 28, 2024 18:42
526ea8c
to
20433b7
Compare
Laupetin
force-pushed
the
feature/obj-container-improvements
branch
2 times, most recently
from
November 17, 2024 21:14
900260e
to
6295500
Compare
Laupetin
force-pushed
the
feature/obj-container-improvements
branch
3 times, most recently
from
December 15, 2024 14:12
4eb71eb
to
ffe0600
Compare
Laupetin
force-pushed
the
feature/obj-container-improvements
branch
3 times, most recently
from
December 22, 2024 21:26
5e0e664
to
5e79414
Compare
Laupetin
force-pushed
the
feature/obj-container-improvements
branch
from
December 23, 2024 21:57
8dceadd
to
f3ee39c
Compare
Laupetin
force-pushed
the
feature/obj-container-improvements
branch
from
December 23, 2024 22:06
f3ee39c
to
835c863
Compare
Laupetin
force-pushed
the
feature/obj-container-improvements
branch
from
December 24, 2024 07:53
4e13645
to
bf481eb
Compare
Laupetin
force-pushed
the
feature/obj-container-improvements
branch
from
December 25, 2024 21:27
15f64d1
to
8cc4147
Compare
Laupetin
force-pushed
the
feature/obj-container-improvements
branch
from
December 26, 2024 09:56
8cc4147
to
8d6a8d2
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously
Currently building IPaks is pretty annoying and building IWDs is not implemented yet.
Previously OBJ containers had to be built as seperate targets.
If they were supposed to include obj data for assets from the built zone they had to include an assetlist which have not been generated automatically and have a fully defined zone file.
Now
This PR tries to unify the building process of fastfile and additional obj containers into a single target.
This aims to improve building of IPaks, IWDs and in the future soundbanks.
This is supposed to result in a built
mod.ff
,mymoddedipakname.ipak
andmymoddediwdname.iwd
.The IPak and IWD contain all supported obj data of the assets that follow.
You can switch to another IWD or IPak by redefining
>ipak,newipak
or>iwd,newiwd
respectively.This will cause all following obj data to go into a new obj container.
This way you can split data.
Specifying the respective metadata key with an empty value
>ipak,
or>iwd,
then you can stop writing data to this obj container.Closes: #27