Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MoE][PyTorch] Add mask-based MoE permutation #1373

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hxbai
Copy link

@hxbai hxbai commented Dec 13, 2024

Description

Add mask-based token permutation and local chunk permutation fused kernels. These kernels are implemented with OpenAI Triton.

Related commit in Megatron-LM NVIDIA/Megatron-LM@ac0474d

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Documentation change (change only to the documentation, either a fix or a new content)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Infra/Build change
  • Code refractor

Changes

Please list the changes introduced in this PR:

  • Non-breaking API changes in te.pytorch.permutation.moe_permute and te.pytorch.permutation.moe_unpermute
  • Add new APIs of te.pytorch.permutation.moe_sort_chunks_by_indices

Checklist:

  • I have read and followed the contributing guidelines
  • The functionality is complete
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@hxbai hxbai changed the title [MoE][Common/PyTorch] Add mask-based MoE permutation [MoE][PyTorch] Add mask-based MoE permutation Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants